Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 64 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: CDJ 850(2) or 800(2) + DJM 500 #2492951
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    We will have to agree to disagree here Terry_42 🙂 . Partly because it’s obviously differences between our countries when it comes to pricing and availability, but also because I value time equal to money. After buying CD’s for almost 20 years, I’ve spend countless hours ripping, renaming, converting and validating my music since 2009 and I’ve ripped and made backups of my most important CD’s long before that. Still have more than 2/3 to go through but I do manage… still find goodies every time I dig in. For me who, has DJing as an income, it makes perfect sense to rip as much as I need, but if it’s only a hobby, and time spend is more valuable behind the decks, then a couple of CDJ’s is a reasonable investment.

    This time atcwalker654@gmail.com clearly stated that it was the larger jogs he wanted for the job and a controller with that big sized jogs would be too expensive. About the pricing I can only refer to what I know is a fact here in Sweden. In one of the Swedish DJ forums on Fb this week there’s been one ad for 2 CDJ-1000MK3’s in condition as new, price equivalent to £450 GBP, and one ad for 4 1000Mk3’s in good full working order, priced at 59 GBP each, or 194 GBP for all 4. The first one’s are gone but the other ones are still available https://www.facebook.com/groups/472597932811212/permalink/1322746534463010/?sale_post_id=1322746534463010. Normal price for them is usually around £300-400 GBP for the pair. That has been the same for the last three years.

    Three years ago I got myself a setup, 1 DJM-800/2 CDJ-1000MK3/Case/Cables for £812 GBP. Newly serviced and new cue/play buttons on the players. I then added a Rane SL-1/Serato, £90 GBP, so now I can use it for all my CD’s and play new stuff from my laptop. A perfect backup solution for me and on the cheap side. 2 weeks of gigs and it was all paid. Profit every time since and will be as long as they work. I use the mixer with a couple of Nexuses as my travel kit, so the mixer has paid off really well with more than 100 gigs already. I realize not everyone play to primarily get paid, but to just have fun, but I think this gear hold it’s value very well if you already have the music in one digital format that works for you, for now.

    in reply to: CDJ 850(2) or 800(2) + DJM 500 #2492791
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    If I got you right, you already have a controller and want a couple of CD-players to add for your CD’s. In that case I recommend getting a couple of CDJ-1000Mk3’s. At least in Sweden you get a pair in good condition for about £800 CAD. Most of the gear sold in Sweden are actually not worn out gear from clubs. Rather semi pro DJ’s who either stopped DJing or upgraded, and knowing the cost, they are usually well taken care of.

    The CDJ-1000Mk3 will be very close to a CDJ-2000 if you’re only going to use CD’s, and is far better build. You will appreciate the bigger wave form and the speed that the 1000Mk3’s read it. You can also save cue’s hot cues and loops on a SD-card. If you don’t need the wave forms, you can use mp3-files on CD. You can also adjust how heave/light you want the jog.

    I have owned the 800’s, 900’s and used quite a lot, the 850’s, and choose the 1000Mk3’s any day for CD’s. Still have mine and use them for practice now and then. Keeps me grounded and yet very similar to the newer high end models. It’s worth saving up another 100 buck or so to get them. The best is, that if you take care of them, you can probably sell them in a couple of years and get most of your money back, because they hold their value very well.

    in reply to: Should I be annoyed or not ? #2491011
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    I have been in projects where this have happened a couple of times. Not my mixes but when supporting a good friend and producer as an adviser, it happened twice. One pure theft like what happened to you, and once where he was offered a partnership and asked to write and sing the vocals of an instrumental progressive EDM track. Fortunately he came to me for the ”judgement call” on the result, and I recognized the track as one of Maison & Dragen. It was a great vocal, but we reported the faker and got away before being dragged in to shame.

    While being flattered and angry at the same time, hang him out to dry. Put links to the scammer and tell everywhere what a fake he is, while also linking to your original mix. That way you can pick up some followers that he might have gotten on your behalf.

    in reply to: Fear Of The Known… #2490481
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    Hey there Karlton! There’s a lot of options out there to post mixes. Just lately Soundcloud announced that they now accept DJ mixes, but if that’s the complete truth remains to be seen. Mixcloud is the place to upload your mixes without worrying about them being taken down because of copyright rules. Then there is a number of well known sites that’s been around for years, but with the legality of the mixes being there in question.

    The big difference is if you can download the mix or not. On Mixcloud you can only stream. If you avoid the biggest and most popular names in any given genre, you can also get your mixes posted on Youtube, but you never know if or when you suddenly get noticed about copyrights that suddenly will affect the whole or part of the mix, or if you get blocked from countries and stopped from being played on mobile devices.

    PM me and I’ll guide you to some of the best sites and through the process of getting your mix ready to post. Start to register on the mentioned sites if you’re not already. You don’t need a website, social media will work fine or even better. Most of the sites allow for drag ‘n’ drop once you have your mix and cover art ready to post. Cheers!

    in reply to: DVS newbie with DJM 900 Nexus? #2490471
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    You need to upgrade your Rekordbox to Rekordbox DJ and the DVS expansion pack. You also need to get the DVS Vinyl. The 900 Nexus is also certified for Serato and Traktor, which means that you also have the choice to use them and you need to get the respective software of course. No other external sound card needed for this mixer. For Serato you get all you need with the Club kit. For traktor I’m not sure, but someone here will know the answer to that. You can also use your CDJ’s in HID or DVS mode if you wanna use them with software once you get into that.

    in reply to: Oldest Dj in Paducah #2479221
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    Thanks guys for making me feel like a teenager again 🙂 . Turned 48 a couple of months ago and I’m obviously the youngster here ha ha.

    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    B.t.w, you can always buy a second hand solution to get more options now with most vendors creating more or less closed echo systems. I got myself a Rane SL1, cost me about 90£, to get some extended life out of my CDJ-1000Mk3’s. If you just want to be able to play your tracks from your laptop, it works absolutely flawless. It only supports Serato Scratch, but I run it on my AMD 1,6 Ghz 4 core laptop with Windows 10/64. It just works :). No more burning CD’s for backup.

    Furthermore, I can use that box with just about any turntables/players/mixer i want. All I need is the DVS signal/media. I’ve invested all I can manage for the next 5 years in my NXS2 setup, so this was the cheap backup solution I could afford and I’m very satisfied with how easy it was to setup and how solid it seems to be.

    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    My first thought was that just buy the DJM-450 and go from there. I don’t think the DVS vinyl is included but the licences for RB DJ and the DVS are. With the Magvel fader and the well known Pioneer layout you’ll be ready to rock in minutes.

    This also sets you up for digital DJ’ing in every other aspect if you wanna go down that road later. The pioneer CDJ’s and XDJ’s will be supported by RB DJ from the get go and as for Traktor and Serato, I think it’s a matter of time. For the NXS2 setup it took 9-10 months to get compatible. This should go faster.

    With the RB DJ, you’ll be prepared not only to add new gear later. You’ll be prepared to export your music libraries to a USB-stick without any other preparations. If the time and opportunity comes your way later, you can show up with that USB-stick and a pair of headphones to any club that uses the Pioneer club gear, and do your thing. It’s not that big of a step to use the CDJ-2000/Nxs/Nxs2’s and do your routines.

    It’s 22 years since I left the vinyl for CD’s but I’m still very much hooked to the way I played the vinyl for the first 10 years. I get you completely when you say you don’t want your Technics too far away, because it will interrupt your way of playing. I’m all digital today using the Pioneer NXS/NXS2 range of products, but I prefer not to place my gear in any other way than I’ve done for the last three decades.

    This weekend I’m going to play in a large venue and I’m told there’s a XDJ-RX in the booth. If I can, I will bring my own CDJ-2000Nxs/DJM-800 just to avoid spending half the evening focusing on learning the RX instead of giving my all to the people, …and i’ve tested the RX, and think it’s a great unit, but some of the key buttons are placed in different places and I would to have look around for info on the one screen, that I can find with a glance otherwise.

    Good luck with your choices and welcome to the digital era 🙂 .

    in reply to: Same BPMs #2474401
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    Using Rekordbox, the analyzed music will show you the very exact BPM of each track. Setting the pitch fader is usually done the moment the track is loaded in the player. It takes only a second and there’s no need to check if the speed is the same unless you play tracks with variable speed like old disco tracks. I use the 6% setting on the pitch fader and adjust the pitch by raising it to the exact same frame/BPM on both tracks. Like 124.2. Each decimal has 5 frames, so it’s important to set each track the same.

    Done that, I can start the track a minute before the transition is supposed to happen, take off my headphones, and still know that I will be in perfect sync during the whole transition. This is the ”new” way to do it and it’s possible because the new club gear is so exact. Most of us older dudes that started with vinyl still does it the ”old” way Terry_42 describes it. That’s because when playing vinyl, the speed shifts slightly over time, so during long transitions, you have to adjust the speed or nudge the platter during the transition. It works, but you can hear the DJ nudging the platter as the tracks goes out of sync for a ms each time.

    Playing soul/funk/disco originals, this is still the way I play, even on the latest club gear, and for some people it’s actually the way they want to see the DJ play. It makes you work the platters through the whole mix, versus playing new house music where you can focus on using the mixer/effects instead, or stand there waiting until it’s time to change tracks… doing the hearts and throwing cakes or whatever is your way out of boredom 🙂 . Some DJ’s just speed up their mixing giving people 30 sec’s/track to avoid the waiting… Whatever fits you and your crowd 🙂 .

    in reply to: Memory Stick (it to 'em)… #2464701
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    Hey Mike! Not so off topic… At least it’s connected, but perhaps it should be moved to it’s own thread. Moderator decides.

    Besides working as a DJ I also work with computers and everything related to them. I have used my knowledge to build my own machines over the years. My main computer for the moment is a 3 year old AMD 8 core @ 4.4 Ghz, 16 GB 2133 DDR3, OS drive Samsung 250 GB 840 pro, Windows 10 Pro. For storage I have 6 internal Hdd’s, a total of 16 TB and 2 external 2 TB Hdd’s.

    If I had the money I’d upgrade to an Intel 6-core/12 threads, but this one will have to last a couple of years more…

    What’s important to me is the fact that the 8 cores is fully utilized when I use Rekordbox, Mixed-In-Key and Platinum Notes4. To process 200 tracks are a no-brainer through all 3 stages and the final step, exporting to my two external SSD’s I use for my music. I can do all of it within an hour. Comes in handy busy Fridays when every minute counts to get the last music ready to play… As long I’ve sorted the music and picked the ones I want/need to add, this is the last step of my work flow every week. Of course it’s not always 200 tracks, but you get the idea…

    Using Sata 3 drives and USB3 is important to get the speed wanted here. A couple of times a year I clean out my SSD’s and export everything back, +12000 tracks (120GB). Doing this to two SSD’s in no problem to manage during a day. It’s nice to clean out bad playlists/tracks and knowing everything is OK now and then. Every time I update my laptop, AMD 4 core @ 2.0 Ghz, I get reminded why I need a fast primary computer for my music. Everything takes at least 5 times longer on the laptop. That’s 5 hours vs 1 hour doing the same job.

    This is about saving the unpaid time you need to prepare for the weekends, so assume you can save 1 hour/week… do the math and it’s quite easy to motivate an investment in a faster computer 🙂 .

    in reply to: Memory Stick (it to 'em)… #2464431
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    Hello Karlton!

    The easy way to recommend USB sticks is say ”buy usb3, the expensive ones”. That will in most cases give you fast and durable sticks with 5-10 years warranty. They also come in all shapes and form. I recommend the smaller ones because it’s lesser risk of someone bending it destroying the stick or/and the usb port while playing.

    Since a year back I have moved to SSD’s in external 2.5” usb3-case. I have 2 identical 250 GB SSD’s. I store about 12000 tracks that I bring with me at all times. They work perfect with all the XDJ’s, 700/1000/1000Mk2/RX and the Nexus’s/Nxs2’s. The older 350/850/900 and even the first 2000 has problems to read that many songs/playlists. You get the not so fun ”WAIT” when switching between playlists. The 2000’s is ok, usually not more than 3-5 secs WAIT, but he other models, no. For those I still use my USB-sticks up to 32 GB, if I have to use them, or I’d rather bring my own players. I’m fortunate to have the Nxs/Nxs2’s that I can bring when needed.

    My preferred sticks has been The Patriot Supersonic Rage XT. I used them for almost two years updating them every week and still have them for backup. I think they are replaced with a newer model now.

    The benefit of using SSD’s is several. 1. Extremely fast transfer speed when moving music to them. Sometimes saves the day 🙂 . 2. High quality SSD’s + external case gives you twice the space for half the price compared to high quality sticks. I use the Samsung 850 Evo. 3. It’s usually enough space to bring both Rekordboxed music and plain folders that you can use for Serato or any other software. 4. Still small enough to fit in your pocket and also easy to tuck away while playing making it harder for someone to steal it. 5. If you discover that SSD’s wasn’t for you, you can always use them for your computer 🙂 .

    Note. The slow performance I experience with older CDJ’s could be related to which file system is used. I use Fat32 for best compatibility and I use Windows computers. It could be that the Apple file system is better, but I cant say because I don’t use Macs. Perhaps someone else has knowledge to share about this.

    in reply to: Music for Middle Aged audience #2464101
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    I agree with DJ Vintage completely, but i have to add a change that I’ve noticed more and more over the last few years. The reason is called Spotify and the change is that more often even the guests +40, +50, are up to date with the current top 40 music. Comments like ”Hey’ we’re not THAT old…” and ”not dead and buried yet” are also quite common if you stick to the 70’/80′ classics too long :)? . The ladies has always been more updated with the newer music but now also the guys +40 manages to play Spotify from their tablets and phones, and while they load their teenage favorites first in the playlists, they do find a new track here and there that they add as well 🙂 . The trendy Deep Nu Vocal House usually works fine on this audience if you wanna/can go modern.

    This is a mix I made entirely based on a request playlist a couple of weeks beforehand a 40th birthday celebration party I played last year. The party was held in Oskarshamn, a small city on the Swedish east coast, and I made this to be sure this was what they wanted.

    Maybe not what you’d expect when the guests age are between late 30’s to mid 50s :). That’s why asking the hosts for a playlist is so valuable if possible. The party went very well and I was booked on another event this year for the same people.

    in reply to: trying to mix trance #2463431
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    I’ve been playing alla sorts of electronic dance music since the 80’s. I don’t think you should think about it like you have to mix Trance in a certain way. Every track has parts that make them special. That can be a vocal, drop, break/build up…. or anything really. Those are the parts you want to be in the mix. If you take it to the next level, live gigs, there you really have to use the part of the track that makes people dance. If you mix your sets up with other genres the same rules apply.

    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    In the terms of using the waveform, that’s how I used the vinyl before i learned a new track. At least on 12”. For me, getting waveforms, starting with the CDJ-1000Mk3’s, made me look at that instead of the time and the cd-cover where I wrote everything about the track. Intros, outros, fading…, everything i could ”see” on the vinyl before.

    No one called it cheating when looking at the vinyl for info, so why should it be cheating looking on a digital waveform. After all, when you know a track inside out, you’ll be using your ears anyway. Now, with my new Nxs2, I’m trying to get used to RGB wave forms and that is not going to well… it looks good, but doesn’t tell me anything I know it’s supposed to do. I’m certain that someone here who’s been using RGB wave forms longer than me can tell why they are better 🙂 , but for me it feels cluttered.

    in reply to: Burning CD's #2450181
    Peter Lindqvist
    Participant

    Hello. A cheap and easy way to get started is ”CDBurnerXP”, and yes, it’s not only for windows XP 😉 . It’s for all the latest windows OS’s. Easy to use interface. Drag & drop your music files. Conversion to CD format i automatic. For audio CD’s, use ”Audio”. For mp3 CD’s, use ”Data”.

    Make sure your file names are in order. That way, when you go to ”Cover”, the program will import the file names and voila, there’s your tracks on the cover, ready to print out. Several possibilities to make the layout your own.

    Burning: Rule no.1 Always use the slowest possible burning rate. 4x is usually Ok.
    Rule no.2 Don’t over burn. This is possible to do, but can render the hole CD unreadable for some players.

    Brand of CD’s. I’ve been using Verbatim’s for a long time. Other brands will probably work just fine, but I know that my Verbatim’s I burned 15+ years ago still plays fine.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 64 total)