Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 46 through 57 (of 57 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Serato auto-gain confusion #2023396
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    I already had a USB interface so just picked up some RCA to XLR cables and ran the controller into that. Problem solved!

    I’d rather have not had to get extra cables but I can manually control the gain properly gain so I’ll take that as a win!

    GP

    in reply to: Tech House Mix #2023391
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    Nice mix mate. Great track selection and v.smooth mixes.

    GP

    in reply to: Serato auto-gain confusion #2022497
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    Thanks for the feedback everyone 🙂

    I totally agree that auto-gain is best avoided. The reason I’ve had to use it is that as far as I can tell, the physical gain knobs on the DDJ-SR have no impact on the software gain, just the gain via the Master-out (and I presume the booth-out as well).

    This is fine for playing live but doesn’t work too well when I’m trying to record directly in Serato, which takes it’s gain levels from the software, not the hardware.

    I think I may just have to run the controller back into my laptop and record in another piece of software. It’s not the end of the world but feels like a real oversight on Serato’s part if this is a real limitation!

    GP

    Groovepunk
    Participant

    I think it’s a great idea!

    1) Would you like to see such a competition? If yes, how often (monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, yearly, other)?

    YES! I think monthly would be good as long as the judges had the time to properly assess the entries.

    2) Would you participate if we had such competition? If yes, would you participate occassionally or every time?

    I would certainly try and enter every time

    3) Do you think there should be a senior/junior DJ competition or just one big one?

    My initial answer was to have different levels, but then I was unsure quite how you would define each category and whether you trusted people to honestly put themselves in the correct one (cynical I know!)

    4) What criteria do you think a mix should be judged on?

    Broadly I think there’s two main criteria with a bunch of sub-criteria:

    1. CREATIVITY/MUSICAL SKILL:

    – Flow (do the tracks fit well together)
    – Track selection (Beatport top 100 or obscure/rare tracks)
    – Creative flair (FX etc – does crossover with below)

    2. TECHNICAL SKILLS:

    – Mixing/blending (appropriate to the style of music)
    – Sound quality (good gain/eq control)
    – FX/scratching/tricks (where appropriate)

    5) What kind of reward do you think is suitable for the winner?

    Obviously the bigger the better (more entrants) but kit is always a good prize. If the DDT guys could flex their networking muscles and swing some radio/club spots/gigs then that’s cool too!

    Overall it’s a great idea. Let me know if you need any help setting it up 🙂

    GP

    in reply to: Deep & Funky House Podcast #2022338
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    Thanks for the feedback guys!

    Parafinn – which track has Rick Astley on it? If there is one I was certainly not aware of it I promise! 🙂

    in reply to: Deep & Funky House Podcast #2021485
    Groovepunk
    Participant
    in reply to: Vocal, Soulful Funky House Mix #2021480
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    Hey Mullaney. Really liking this and your other mix.

    Track selection is great, mixing is tight and it provided a nice summery vibe on a grey day!

    GP

    in reply to: trance set #2021472
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    Hey. Just finished listening the to mix. Really enjoyed it – the great track selection/variety was a real stand out point for me.

    I agree with D-Jam on the melody on melody clashing. To me (and feel free to correct me if I’m wrong) it definately feels like you’re rushing out of some of the tracks and therefore having to mix in the ‘busy’ part of the track. Having mixed a fair bit of trance over the years I can feel your pain in terms of the structure of trance tracks almost forcing you to play them for longer as the quieter/less busy sections tend to be right at the end.

    I like D-Jam’s suggestion of editing tracks. If you don’t want to do that then looping may also be a solution. The world of digital/controllers makes this much easier than it used to be! Many trance tracks have a short ‘rest’ around 2/3 of the way through that you could loop and mix out of without clashing the melodies/energy as much. You wouldn’t wanted to do this all the time but it could get you out of a tight spot now and again.

    Feel free to ignore me though! Just speaking from experience!

    Keep up the mixes mate. I’ll definately check out your next one 🙂

    in reply to: MacBook Air with Serato DJ #1026645
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    If it helps at all, the setup you describe (Macbook Air 2012 + Serato DJ) is exactly what I use and (touch wood) I haven’t had a single issue to date.

    in reply to: FLOW DJ, Mixed in Key #1017459
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    I managed to download the free trial version before they closed it off (I think it was the first day or two after launch).

    Like many reviewers, I was underwhelmed and it definately feels like a work in progress.  It’s so basic I’m surprised they’re actually selling it for $58 straight out of the gates.  To be fair this is cheaper than the likes of Traktor Pro 2 but not far off the cost of Cross DJ which is far more developed and feature rich.

    In it’s current state I couldn’t recommend it for serious DJing.  It’s just too basic and lacks a lot of the features that you’d expect.

    Mixed in Key on the other hand is a useful tool if you’re seriously thinking about harmonic mixing.  Running tracks through MIK has become a standard part of my workflow and I even quite like the ‘energy’ rating even though I sometimes disagree with it.

    The interesting thing now is that if you were seriously considering MIK you may as well just get Flow (they’re the same price), as its ‘Preparation’ section performs much the same functions as MIK (someone please correct me if I’m wrong) and you get the DJ software as well which will (hopefully) improve over time.

    in reply to: Ddj Sr #1017216
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    Hi SCF.  I’ve found all the output volumes to be very good, but then this is pretty subjective and depends how sensitive your hearing is!  If this is a really important factor then testing the controller in a store is definately recommended.

    The mic quality is also good with no problems – so perhaps it has been fixed since the issues with the SX as you suggest.

    in reply to: Ddj Sr #1017157
    Groovepunk
    Participant

    After some signficant delays I finally got my DDJ-SR at the weekend and I have to say it’s an excellent piece of kit. The build quality is great (it’s actually heavier than I expected).  The jogs are smooth but with a bit of weight behind them (if that makes sense) and the performance pads don’t click like a few other controllers I’ve tried.

    Personally I couldn’t see much of a reason to pay the extra £300+ for the SX as the additional features didn’t really interest me.  Despite using CDJs quite extensively recently I don’t miss the jog LED centre, have never needed 4 channels and don’t need to hook up loads of other kit.

    I’m happy to answer any questions or try things out on it if it would help anyone make a decison.

Viewing 12 posts - 46 through 57 (of 57 total)