Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 267 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • softcore
    Member

    Hmmmmm interesting topic!

    Indeed, I too never considered myself a die-hard “clubber”…Sure while in my 20ies I’d go to most of the major events where I live but still, I wasnt feeling like clubbing is my “lifestyle” – or to put it better, it wasnt a defining part of my lifestyle. I really got into electronic music and I guess this is even more of a reason not to be a die-hard clubber (even though it sounds contradictive, its not) – as in, when you are into this music and you get educated about it, you become, unavoidably, more selective. The mediocre, boring, generic DJ set isnt very fun now and you certainly dont need/want to swallow pills or sniff stuff to enjoy electronic music – if its good, that’s all you want. Consequently, you become more selective – you are a harsh judge of what you hear, and in what environment.
    Nowadays, I’ll DJ only at a couple of favourite spots where I live which cannot be considered clubs even though club music is played – and frankly, I prefer them from the huge, faceless, substance-loaded places. Yep, Im still not a die-hard clubber me thinks. 😉

    in reply to: interesting vegas article on edm djs #43431
    softcore
    Member

    djrizki, post: 43520, member: 11983 wrote: Really interesting…
    So basically, I have to pay 50 dolla to hear David Guetta spinning mix-tapes eh ? LOL

    PS by reading their comments on that page, why so many hate on the DJ’s comments? Comments like “I can just push a button and fist pump, I can do that im a DJ” or ” A person determining which song to play next for people who are either drunk or tripping isn’t exactly an exact science” LOL ?
    Is this how the majority people felt about DJ’s now ? Just ignorant and sad

    Although I know where you are coming from, dont tell me the view of the majority of people who are NOT into electronic music or clubbing or DJs themselves are not justified to have such an opinion….I mean, look at what types of guys exactly become succesful in this thing….Besides some very few bright examples of the past where the artistic quality and the persistence to hard work were evident for the sucess of a DJ or a producer, the last years all we see is “rock stardom” overnight…..

    Frankly, I cant blame the non-initiated for the bad opinion they have about DJs.

    in reply to: Sound Design Help #43384
    softcore
    Member

    Don’t hesitate to ask more detailed stuff about what a specific function – parameter of a synth does if you are not sure! Im always happy to share knowledge on this level – in a way, I love watching people really getting to the bottom of things instead of just mangling around sampled melodies and beats in a DAW and call it their “music”.

    😉

    softcore
    Member

    Although Im a strictly Windows guy, I just cant trust Windows 8 for ANY real-time critical task at the moment – especially audio related.

    in reply to: Best software or way to cut track points for a mixed cd #43331
    softcore
    Member

    +1 for Audacity unless you already own a DAW

    in reply to: Sound Design Help #43325
    softcore
    Member

    Well thats a general thing isnt it? We tend to think that an expensive product means more thought, work and quality control has been put on it. So, a more expensive VST plug in may be better in terms of sound quality, CPU and memory usage, features etc etc. Especially in sound quality a lot of that has to do with the way the oscillators, filters and other “parts” of the plug in have been coded. You might meet in some expensive VST synthesizers the term “virtual analogue” or “analogue emulation” implying that the virtual “circuitry” of the plug in has been coded in such a way that it emulates the “imperfections”, nuances and intricacies of a real electronic circuit of a real analogue synth. – the so called “analogue sound is better” myth has actually a logical explanation different than what many people tend to think – analogue sound is not better, it just has “errors” and “imperfections” and these characteristis is what makes vintage, hardware analogue synthesizers unique (at least according to the majority of synthheads, lets not get into what my personal opinion is because whenever I describe it people think Im either a heretic or that I dont know what Im talking about).
    A lot has been said about these so called emulations and whether they actually achieve to “capture” the authentic sound of a real synthesizer. Most of the producer geeks will tell you that for example all of the Arturia’s “Analog classics” plug ins are quite good at replicating the real thing and there are also other synths that are very respected amongst the geeks who are crazy with this stuff like Sylenth1 or any of U-He‘s stuff.

    Although, as in all things, likewise in this market too, there are also marketing tricks and sometimes a high price doesnt always mean you get a high quality product – or to put it better, sometimes the price of a VST plug in cannot be justified by its quality. All in all, I’d advise a beginner to start with the bundled instruments of his DAW (no extra cost) and when he starts to “get” the whole notion of sound design synthesis and feels like he’s ready to move to more complex synths or different synthesis methods (like frequency modulation for example, where the “king” here is Native Instruments’ “FM8”) then he might want to invest into such an instrument. In any case, its best if you have already toyed around with the synths you already own in your DAW, get to know the basics and then give your hard earned money to more stuff.

    in reply to: The Adaptive DJ,the future,past,present or not needed? #43301
    softcore
    Member

    Chuck van Eekelen, post: 43449, member: 2756 wrote: ….This is all fine if you already know EXACTLY what it is you want to do, but if you are new to a specific program, you have no clue what you want to do yet or what is possible.

    Excellent! So that means, that people need to know what THEY want to DO, NOT how its done in the software. And here lies the heart of the problem: people wrongly think they need to “learn” the program, when in reality they need to learn what THEY want to DO…then transfer that TO the program!

    I guess what Im trying to say is younger generations who have grown in this “software” world have got it a bit mixed – up: it used to be the case that a person already had the basics of an art or a technical procedure, the terminology and all the technical details. Then, came the software to simplify these procedures – nowadays, people seem to be wanting to “bypass” the fundamental principles and get straight to using the software – well of course then, the manual wont suffice. Knowing to operate Traktor doesnt make you a DJ – if you learn how to DJ though, you could operate ANY DJ software after a good manual read and 15 minutes of toying around (there, I came back to the topic)

    😉

    in reply to: Sound Design Help #43288
    softcore
    Member

    Lets clear things up a little for those wanting to dwelve into synthesizers and sound design.

    DAWs, VST (effects) and VSTi (instruments) are essentially the virtual/digital equivalent of having a studio and starting to fill it up with gear – samplers, synthesizers and signal processors (effects). Instead of relying on the “factory” (yet most of the times third party) instruments and effects that come “bundled” with your DAW software, VST plug-ins is a standardised way to use third party instruments and effects inside the DAW you have chosen.

    There are NO VST or VSTi plug ins that I know of that claim to be “optimised” for a certain DAW – and frankly, if they were, they would be probably “bad” from a developers point of view – the VST technology is a strict standard that all VST – VSTi developers and DAW developers (should) follow so that compatibility of ANY VST inside ANY DAW can be posible – there are small deviations from the protocol which result in some plug ins not exposing sidechain inputs in some DAWs or some other minor misfunctions but lets not get into that now.

    Generally speaking, the “instruments” can be divided in 3 large categories.

    1. Synthesizers – emulating the circuitry of a real instrument, synthesizers are essentially creating sound out of electricity. In its most basic form, a synthesizer features some sort of initial sound source, usually one (or more) oscillators. Think of “oscillators” of a synth as an equivalent of the strings of a guitar. Its the initial source of sound. Then this sound is processed inside the synthesizer with various methods such as filters, amplification envelopes, modulation matrixes, effectc etc etc and you got yourself a sound design tool.

    2. Samplers – as the name suggests, in these instruments the initial sound is derived-taken from an already recorded sound. People new to production tend to think that samplers then, cannot really create a unique and “personal” or “authentic” sound because the source is already commonplace to others but thats not true. Especially in this day and age, VST samplers have so much methods built-in to mangle a sound that a beginner can hardly distinguish a “sampler” from a synthesizer (have a look at a Kontakt scripted instrument and you ‘ll know what I mean).
    Nowadays, samplers come with large libraries of samples already bundled but you can always load your own files into a sampler (usually in an uncompressed sound file format like wav) and build your own sampled instrument.

    3. ROMplers – what Nexus is…. ROMplers are really samplers – they use samples as a first sound source but the difference with samplers is that they come bundled with a proprietary, closed file system that does not allow the user to add more samples. To my humble personal opinion, its the “least” creative tool of all the categories: in synthesizers you have all the stuff dependant on your decisions – in samplers, you use already recorded initial sounds BUT you at least get to choose them. In ROMplers you just mangle what’s already in there and you cant add your own samples.
    Maybe now it becomes clear why Nexus is so damn huge (in file size) as opposed to a simple VST synthesizer – its presets are not settings of the synth alone, but also include the original samples used.

    And here we come to another misconception I have seen with lots of beginners – they fail to grasp the correlation between a synth and its presets. I have heard too many times from beginners:
    “So this synth has these sounds (presets)” and the answer is “NO, it doesn thave these sounds” – it has these presets but it can create infinitely more sounds. The “presets” are merely stored settings of all the knobs, faders, buttons and whatnot you see on the synth GUI. When you change/load a preset in a VST synth there’s not a magical pre-made sound loaded….only settings of the knobs, faders, buttons etc are changed and these changes in their entirety are responsible for the sound that is now coming out of the synth.
    The presets of a VST synth are not ALL the sounds it can make – they serve as a “demo” of the synths capabilities, as a starting point for your own sounds or even as final sounds for your production if they happen to be what you were looking for – but if you are not into trance or big house electro/EDM – trust me, you wont find ANY synth’s majority of presets appealing. They usually are BIG, FAT sounds for a reason: they showcase the synth, its not ALL it can offer.

    So…….if you want to design sounds, any VST synth will do, period. The fact that it has presets does not mean you cant create your OWN sounds with it. But in order to do that you have to have a clear understanding of terminology and what “this knob does”.

    in reply to: The Adaptive DJ,the future,past,present or not needed? #43285
    softcore
    Member

    For reasons already explained, I think its more convenient for a DJ to settle with one software instead of preping for all of them. That said, I think the majority of producers who DJ or generally of people with a basic knowledge of how music software works would be equally comfortable to DJ with ANY software thrown at them. You are not alone!

    On a related side-note I always find it weird that people need to find tutorials or youtube videos to get how a program that comes with a “manual” works. RTFM! Its all in there! And its not like we are asking you to write code (max/MSP) – its a freaking mixer with two-four decks on the screen and a layout-functionality clearly explained in the manual – what the hell you need a tutorial for?

    in reply to: Few questions about Traktor.. #43284
    softcore
    Member

    My favourite trick to create a build-up to drop out of a simple, four bar loop:

    1.Start with a hi pass filter – engage it and cut the lows
    2.Activate a reverb effect with minimum wet signal and short decay
    3.Gradually do all of these things – sweep the filter to upper frequencies, increase the wet signal of the reverb (but not more to 50% if you have a dry-wet configuration) and increase the decay of the reverb
    4. After 2 or 4 bars (depending on how much you want your audience to wait) instantly deactivate all the effects – the effect is nicer if the reverb’s signal is not cut – in other words if your software allows you to stop signal going TO the reverb effect but NOT the reverbs output. (i.e. keep the remaining “tail” of the reverb once the beat has dropped).
    5. You can also drop a small delay effect right before dropping the beat for added crescento!

    😉

    in reply to: Moody Dark Playful Minimal Set #43283
    softcore
    Member

    Nice one!

    in reply to: The dj pushing buttons vs. producer/performer debate #43018
    softcore
    Member

    I think its my turn to clarify that when talking about DJing – FALSELY – only club DJs come to my mind. For that reason, most of my thoughts are focused on that aspect – NOT to say of course that being a wedding DJ does not require a (different as noted above) set of skills.

    😉

    in reply to: The dj pushing buttons vs. producer/performer debate #42942
    softcore
    Member

    I used to be a producer long before getting into the digital DJ thing – or to put it better, I used to make my own tracks long before I made my own DJ mixes.

    So I guess, a guy like me (coming from a producer’s background) stating that DJs and producers are EQUALLY artists, has some extra “weight” on the argument.

    As Terry said, in a nutshell, its all about your passion, the love you got for the music and the love you got for what you do. You can be an artist even if you simply DJ with two decks or if you are making sort of a live performance.

    You can be a lazy ass boring guy, even if you DJ or you make one of those generic, “downloaded-this-sample-CD-and-made-a-track-out-of-10-loops” producer.

    TLDR – the “DJ” or “producer” definition ALONE, CANNOT define if a person is a real artist or not.

    P.S – I do disagree though, that filling up a stadium means that you must be doing something right (artistically). In most of the cases, it can only mean you must be paying a lot to marketeers, or your marketeers must be doing something right. And frankly Im tired of people thinking that the “big” guys are envied (edit to add: not aiming this particularly to you Terry) – sometimes its just simply that I dont agree aesthetically with 13 in a douzin generic, overplayed and over-heard musical concepts. Britney Spears used to fill stadiums too – didnt make her more of an artist to my ears and Im definitely not jealous of her musical skills. 😉

    in reply to: The One available #41268
    softcore
    Member

    Just out of curiosity…is it only in MY system that I dont see the General Options as displayed here:
    http://one.dj/index.php?page=manual-settings

    or is it, generally, a demo limitation?

    edit: I mean, I DO have “general options” but no wallpaper setting and most importantly no audio engine settings….

    in reply to: Midi Contoller advice #40843
    softcore
    Member

    I think its discontinued but I would die if something happend to my BCR 2000 by Behringer…Check to see if you can find any stock anywhere….

    Why?

    Besides the amount of physical controls (32 knobs, 16 buttons + 8 knob-push buttons x 32 preset banks) which cant find ANYWHERE in this price range (most controllers feature the typical 8 fader – 8 knobs = 16, + 8 buttons ) its midi messages are fully customisable.

    Totally recommended!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 267 total)